Chief Justice DY Chandrachud: Justice DY Chandrachud is the fiftieth Chief Justice of India and he has given many essential choices throughout his tenure, which is why folks need to learn about his retirement plan. Will he stay a public life or will he stay a really non-public life? Whereas speaking to Hindustan Times, DY Chandrachud mentioned that the general public all the time sees a Chief Justice in the identical type, therefore he ought to maintain this in thoughts even after retirement.
DY Chandrachud accomplished his tenure of greater than two years. Earlier than retirement, DY Chandrachud gave verdict on bulldozer motion, 3 had been additionally concerned within the determination of 'Spouse just isn’t husband's property'.
Justice DY Chandrachud is the 14th Chief Justice within the historical past of the Supreme Courtroom of India who has accomplished a tenure of greater than two years. Justice Mandakolathur Patanjali Sastri, the primary Chief Justice of India, was the primary Justice who accomplished a tenure of two years and 139 days. Justice DY Chandrachud grew to become a decide of the Supreme Courtroom in 2016 and have become the Chief Justice on 9 November 2022.
Additionally Learn: This image of Sunita Williams with sunken cheeks, solely pores and skin on her physique went viral, she is consuming double the meals, NASA is frightened
Click on to learn explainers on varied subjects
What’s the connection between Bollywood and gangster, why did Shahrukh Khan get risk after Salman?
5 massive choices of Justice DY Chandrachud: Earlier than retirement, DY Chandrachud gave the decision on bulldozer motion, 4 had been additionally concerned within the determination of 'Spouse just isn’t husband's property'
If we take a look at the tenure of Justice DY Chandrachud, he gave many essential choices whereas holding the put up of Chief Justice, which had a large influence. He gave a speech on his farewell and likewise mentioned that those that used to troll him will now change into unemployed.
1. The choice to abrogate Article 370 was upheld: A five-member bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud dominated that the federal government was proper to abrogate Article 370, as a result of there’s a provision to present particular standing to Jammu and Kashmir within the Structure. It was a short lived association.
2. Resolution to declare the Electoral Bond Scheme unconstitutional: Justice DY Chandrachud, presiding over a five-member bench, declared the Electoral Bond Scheme unconstitutional and mentioned that the amendments made within the Structure to implement this scheme are unconstitutional, therefore Banks ought to instantly cease promoting this bond. Electoral bonds may very well be bought from banks, via which political events had been funded.
3. Bulldozer case: The Supreme Courtroom gave its determination in opposition to bulldozer motion and mentioned that if an individual is responsible, then bulldozer motion just isn’t justified. The Supreme Courtroom mentioned that bulldozer motion just isn’t justified underneath the rule of regulation. As CJI, Justice Chandrachud gave his ultimate verdict on this situation and referred to as the bulldozer motion in opposition to basic rights. Aside from this, Justice DY Chandrachud was additionally concerned within the determination of many different essential circumstances, though he was not the Chief Justice at the moment. Vital subjects like proper to privateness, decriminalization of homosexuality, decriminalization of adultery, Ayodhya dispute and Sabarimala dispute had been included.
What can’t the Chief Justice do after retirement?
Article 124 of the Structure focuses on the necessity and formation of the Supreme Courtroom. Section 124(7) of this text states that the Chief Justice and different Justices of the Supreme Courtroom will be unable to follow regulation in any court docket in India after their tenure ends i.e. after retirement. The aim of this technique is to take care of the repute of the judges. Nevertheless, judges can serve within the public service, and plenty of judges function governors or members of presidency committees.
Additionally Learn: Sharda Sinha by no means compromised for cash, whether or not it was Gulshan Kumar or Anurag Kashyap.
Click Here To Join Our Telegram Channel
If in case you have any considerations or complaints concerning this text, please tell us and the article shall be eliminated quickly.
