Thiruvananthapuram > Minister MB Rajesh in opposition to the faux information given by Twenty 4 News concerning the switch of workers of Paruthur Panchayat. The information was that the mass switch of the staff of the league-ruled panchayat was a political revenge of the native minister. The minister’s Fb put up is exactly explaining the lie within the information.
MB Rajesh’s Fb notice:
A information of Twenty 4 News got here to our consideration simply now. The information is an effective instance of how the media offers information that isn’t factual and doesn’t even have primary media etiquette.
Mass switch of workers in Paruthur Panchayat in Native Self-Authorities Minister’s Constituency, League-ruled Panchayat is a political vendetta by Native Minister, mass switch has introduced panchayat administration to a standstill… That is the gist of the information.
Now let us take a look at the info
1. Public Transfer in Panchayat Division for the yr 2022 has been carried out on-line utterly software program primarily based. There are three senior clerk posts and 4 clerk posts in Paruthur gram panchayat. 3 senior clerks from Paruthur gram panchayat additionally bought on-line switch. In the identical switch order, two individuals have been made obtainable by the software program instead of these three individuals. However out of those two, one from Attapadi pleaded that it will be very tough to relocate, so he was allowed to shift to a different panchayat. The second resigned throughout this era. When the 2 appointees weren’t obtainable, two individuals from the promotion record have been instantly appointed within the emptiness. One has been employed since December 14. The opposite one that joined the job was granted 4 months depart from December 30 by the panchayat itself and never by the federal government. The third emptiness shall be crammed from the promotion record issued instantly.
2. Out of the 4 clerks, three have utilized for switch. Not a single particular person utilized to come back to Paruthur by way of the identical relocation course of. Subsequently, the software program system was not made obtainable to anybody in Paruthur. On this case three individuals have been appointed to the workplace on totally different dates inside two weeks. Certainly one of these went on lengthy depart earlier than becoming a member of. The remaining particular person will be a part of the subsequent day. There have been 4 clerks, besides the one who went on depart, three have been made obtainable there. Motion can be being taken to fill a emptiness on depart.
3. It must be remembered that there have been no vacancies in Paruthur earlier than the 2022 common relocation. The emptiness got here after nobody utilized for that workplace. Now there is just one emptiness left as a consequence of non-appointment in itself.
4. The Panchayat President will inform me about this solely on January 7, 2023, and I’ve assured that the Authorities has assured the Native Self-Authorities Presidents that the staff is not going to be transferred over the past quarter of the monetary yr, and that switch from one other Panchayat to Paruthur isn’t straightforward, however the issue will be resolved. The president himself, who’s the chief of the league, says that an worker was appointed the very subsequent day. And he has not raised the allegation of political discrimination. It’s an allegation that even he didn’t say, and the twenty-four reporter is elevating it on his personal. The President and his group, who gave me the letter on January 7, went to the DDP workplace on the tenth and staged a sit-in. He nonetheless didn’t say it was political discrimination. The President stated that the reporter had put it collectively on his personal.
5. Probably the most critical factor is that not solely did the information contradict the stated info, however the reporter who made the allegation on his personal that the minister confirmed political discrimination didn’t examine my half or my workplace’s half or embody it within the information! One sided information. Allegation that the opposite celebration didn’t hear.
A mode of journalism that takes info at face worth and doesn’t search to assemble or perceive info. If the minister had been requested if he had something to say on this, he would have given the info and paperwork talked about right here to the reporter. He did not want that. Is there any cause to not suppose {that a} political allegation was solely supposed to be leveled in opposition to the federal government and the minister?
After three makes an attempt, the reporter was reached on the telephone. After I defined the info one after the other, the reply was, can I ship this data and paperwork? That’s, giving false information arbitrarily with out asking anybody, and the generosity of giving the reality provided that caught red-handed. There isn’t a hope of any change or correction. It will proceed. The one method is to proceed publicity.
Live information is now obtainable on WhatsApp and Telegram.
Click on to Subscribe WhatsApp Channel..
Click on to Subscribe Telegram Channel..
Different information
Click Here To Join Our Telegram Channel
You probably have any issues or complaints concerning this text, please tell us and the article shall be eliminated quickly.Â