Top Stories

No evidence against Nawab Malik, police will file closure report.

मलिकMumbai : Mumbai Police has knowledgeable the Bombay Excessive Courtroom that it has investigated the Atrocities Act case filed towards Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) chief Nawab Malik on behalf of former Narcotics Management Bureau (NCB) regional director Sameer Wankhede and As a consequence of lack of proof, it has been determined to file a closure report. Wankhede had filed a grievance towards Malik below the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act with the suburban Goregaon police in 2022. Final 12 months, Wankhede had filed a petition within the Excessive Courtroom by way of his lawyer Rajiv Chavan, accusing the police of not taking any motion on his grievance and requesting that the case be handed over to the CBI. Extra public prosecutor SS Kaushik knowledgeable the division bench of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Neela Gokhale on January 14 that the police have investigated the case and have determined to file a 'C Abstract Report'.
'C-Abstract Report' is filed in circumstances the place, after investigation, the police come to the conclusion that there is no such thing as a proof and the case is neither true nor false. As soon as such report is filed earlier than the involved trial court docket, the complainant within the case can problem it and after listening to all of the events, the court docket can settle for or reject the closure report. Wankhede, extra commissioner within the Directorate General of Taxpayers Companies (DGTS) and a member of the Mahar Scheduled Caste, had requested for the case to be handed over to the CBI. The bench, whereas disposing of the petition in its order dated January 14, stated that as per the assertion of the police, there may be nothing price contemplating in it. A replica of this order turned obtainable on Tuesday. Nevertheless, the court docket stated Wankhede can take acceptable steps earlier than the suitable discussion board as per regulation.
In December 2024, the Excessive Courtroom had directed the police to analyze the matter and take it to its logical conclusion. The police had then advised the court docket that two extra sections, Section 3(1) Q and R of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, have been included within the case. These sections relate to giving false or frivolous info supposed to trigger harm or misery to a public servant and to deliberately insult or intimidate an individual belonging to a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe.
Wankhede, in his grievance, had alleged that Malik made derogatory feedback towards Wankhede and his relations on the premise of their caste throughout interviews and on his social media. In his petition filed within the Excessive Courtroom, Wankhede claimed that the police haven’t but carried out any investigation within the case and requested handy over the case to the CBI. He had additionally requested the court docket to observe the investigation. Wankhede and Malik have been at loggerheads ever for the reason that NCB arrested Malik's son-in-law Sameer Khan in a drug case in 2021.
Wankhede alleged that after Sameer Khan's arrest, Malik launched a sustained marketing campaign on social media and tv to defame and humiliate him and his household, focused his caste and questioned the authenticity of his caste certificates.

Visited 7 occasions, 7 go to(s) in the present day

Put up Views: 45



Click Here To Join Our Telegram Channel

When you’ve got any considerations or complaints concerning this text, please tell us and the article will likely be eliminated quickly. 

Raise A Concern

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button