Most Recent

'Why didn't you file a petition for bail?': Supreme Court to CM Kejriwal

New Delhi: The Supreme Court docket on Monday questioned jailed Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who has filed a petition difficult his arrest and subsequent detention by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in an excise coverage case, on whether or not he has granted bail. Why has the petition not been filed? Earlier than the trial courtroom.

“Till date you have not filed the application for bail?” A bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna requested the query.

In response, senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, showing for Kejriwal, stated, “We have not filed the bail plea because the arrest is 'illegal' and the breadth of Section 19 (of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act) is very wide.” The arrest itself is illegitimate.”

He stated the ED must show “the need to make an arrest” on “available material” with “reason to believe” that the accused is responsible of an offense underneath the anti-money laundering legislation.

Intervening, Extra Solicitor General SV Raju, representing the ED, stated Kejriwal didn’t elevate any objection to the following detention.

Singhvi responded, “If the initial arrest is illegal, I (Kejriwal) have raised no objection to the subsequent detention.”

Moreover, he argued that the paperwork, together with the CBI FIR and the ED's ECIR, don’t remotely hyperlink Kejriwal to the alleged rip-off.

“There are three supplementary chargesheets (by the CBI) in which I am not named,” Singhvi stated, including that the Delhi Excessive Court docket's denial of interim reduction to a witness merely for “non-cooperation” or safety from coercive motion. Can’t be executed. Grounds for arrest.

“We will hear this tomorrow,” the apex courtroom stated because it rose for the day.

In her newest affidavit filed earlier than the highest courtroom, the AAP supremo has condemned her arrest as politically motivated, and argued that it unfairly advantages the ruling celebration through the ongoing elections, that are 'free and Compromises the precept of 'honest elections'.

He described the case as a primary instance of misuse of businesses like ED by the Central authorities to suppress political opponents, reiterating his stand that the ED's motion was a part of a concerted effort to weaken the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and its leaders. .

In the meantime, the counter affidavit filed by the ED Deputy Director stated that Kejriwal's petition had no advantage and his arrest was mandatory because of his “completely non-cooperative attitude”.

The affidavit stated Kejriwal was avoiding questioning by not showing earlier than the investigating officer regardless of being summoned 9 instances and whereas recording his assertion underneath Section 17 of the PMLA, he was evasive and utterly uncooperative in answering questions. Have been avoiding giving.

Click Here To Join Our Telegram Channel

In case you have any considerations or complaints concerning this text, please tell us and the article will likely be eliminated quickly. 

Raise A Concern

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button