Monday, September 26, 2022
HomeTop StoriesWoman was wearing provocative dress, sexual harassment case is not made, controversy...

Woman was wearing provocative dress, sexual harassment case is not made, controversy over court’s comment

Kerala Court docket: The Kozhikode District Classes Court docket in Kerala, throughout the listening to in a case, mentioned that when a lady was carrying a gown inciting sexual emotions, it doesn’t prima facie represent a case of sexual harassment. On the similar time, now an argument has arisen relating to this remark of the courtroom. The State Fee for Girls has strongly condemned this comment of the courtroom.

The courtroom made this comment whereas granting bail to the accused

The courtroom made the remarks final week whereas granting bail to 74-year-old social activist and author Civic Chandran in a sexual harassment case. The Kozhikode classes courtroom, in its order dated August 12, had held that the {photograph} of the complainant, produced by the accused together with the bail utility, was making it clear that she herself was carrying a gown which was alleged to incite sure sexual emotions. The courtroom additionally mentioned that it’s inconceivable to consider that the 74-year-old and handicapped man forcibly made the complainant sit on his lap and sexually assaulted her.

accused received bail

The courtroom mentioned that for the imposition of Section 354A of the Indian Penal Code, there must be bodily contact, demand or solicitation of sexual relations and obscene remarks. The courtroom noticed that the {photograph} produced by the accused together with the bail utility was disclosing that the complainant himself was wearing a gown which incites sure sexual emotions. Due to this fact, there isn’t any prima facie case for imposition of part 354A towards the accused. Whereas granting bail to the accused, the courtroom mentioned that he will be granted bail on this case.

The chairperson of Kerala Girls’s Fee mentioned this

Expressing concern over the courtroom’s remarks, Kerala Girls’s Fee chairperson P Satheedevi termed it unlucky. He mentioned that by making such remarks even earlier than the manufacturing of proof and the trial was held, the courtroom had dismissed the allegations of the complainant. He mentioned that it sends a really flawed message in severe instances like rape. The courtroom made this remark whereas granting bail within the second case of sexual harassment registered towards the accused. Chandran is an accused in two instances of sexual harassment.

Know the entire matter

In reality, a author coming from the Scheduled Tribe neighborhood had filed a case in April for alleged sexual harassment throughout a ebook exhibition. On the similar time, the second case was filed by a younger author for alleged sexual harassment throughout a ebook exhibition within the metropolis in February 2020. The Koyilandi police had registered instances towards Chandran however couldn’t arrest the accused as he was absconding for the reason that first case was registered. Chandran was granted anticipatory bail within the first case on August 2.

Indian Railway: Youngsters will get tickets within the practice? Know what the Railways mentioned by issuing a proof

Click Here To Join Our Telegram Channel

In case you have any considerations or complaints relating to this text, please tell us and the article can be eliminated quickly. 

Raise A Concern

RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -

Most Popular